- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:46 am to BearCrocs
quote:
Also, why are the justices not letting the attorney respond in full? They keep cutting him off.. Jesus
They are there to answer the Court's questions. Everything the lawyers are saying in their argument was already briefed.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:49 am to BearCrocs
quote:
Also, why are the justices not letting the attorney respond in full? They keep cutting him off.. Jesus
That’s winding me up too.
The Justices would probably say, “because time constraints;” but common sense tells me they could find more natural/appropriate time points to stop counsel from responding or to ask for clarification.
This is what happens when you have too many cooks in the kitchen—each one thinks what s/he has to say is more important what anyone else thinks.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:50 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:06 am to BearCrocs
quote:First oral argument, eh?
why are the justices not letting the attorney respond in full? They keep cutting him off.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News