Started By
Message

re: LIVE (*now adjourned*): Supreme Court hearing case on Trump's Colorado ballot eligibility

Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:29 am to
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72233 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:29 am to
This is a watershed moment.

If states can choose who they allow to run for federal office, this could get wildly out of hand.

If it is upheld, Texas should prevent Biden from running for president within the state.

If states want the ability to determine who can run for state office, so be it.

They can choose “how” elections should be run within their states, but the concept of them choosing “who” can run for federal office is out of the question.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 9:31 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96590 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 9:31 am to
quote:

They can choose “how” elections should be run within their states, but the concept of them choosing “who” can run for federal office is out of the question.


Pretty much.


If this comes to pass, that Soros push to get people elected into SOS and AG positions will cause things to get ugly.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40280 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:19 am to
quote:


This is a watershed moment.

If states can choose who they allow to run for federal office, this could get wildly out of hand.

If it is upheld, Texas should prevent Biden from running for president within the state.

If states want the ability to determine who can run for state office, so be it.

They can choose “how” elections should be run within their states, but the concept of them choosing “who” can run for federal office is out of the question.


It would be another step toward balkanization. Nobody wants that big picture speaking.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram