Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS oral arguments on Trump vs Colorado

Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:08 am to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

a good case

I'm not so sure it is a good case. Their claim about Trump not being an "officer" seems pretty thin to me.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21883 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Their claim about Trump not being an "officer" seems pretty thin to me.


Without knowing the context, why is that thin? Civilian control of the military is one of our bedrocks.
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6682 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:42 am to
Read the Constitutional definition of "Officer" and try again ......
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116320 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I'm not so sure it is a good case. Their claim about Trump not being an "officer" seems pretty thin to me.



bruh

This is one of the easiest cases of all time, should be 9-0.
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6682 posts
Posted on 2/8/24 at 12:14 pm to
Answered that for you with this .....

Brown asked him: 'Why? It seems to me that you have a list and president is not on it.' The list stated in the text lists offices including senator, representative, and even presidential elector.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram