- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boeing, not Spirit, mis-installed piece that blew off Alaska MAX 9 jet, industry source sa
Posted on 2/11/24 at 3:00 pm to Scuttle But
Posted on 2/11/24 at 3:00 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
1) Boeing designed the part
Surprisingly that is not the case for Boeing anymore. The first issue they had with the MAX crashes was a software issue and they didn't write the software themselves, they outsourced it to and Indian company.
Look at the 787 most of the part were designed and built by foreign companies. The 787 is probably more a Japanese airplane than an American one.
Posted on 2/11/24 at 3:18 pm to nick__21
quote:That wasn't the root cause though. The root cause is Boeing rushed the production as an upgraded version of the 737 instead of developing a new aircraft. A new aircraft would have meant a 9-year FAA certification process, where the redesign meant a 3 to 5-year certification process. It was rushed so American Airlines wouldn't switch to the Airbus.
he first issue they had with the MAX crashes was a software issue and they didn't write the software themselves, they outsourced it to and Indian company.
The redesign had wider and heavier engines, which meant the fuselage would be longer and the wings would be wider. To stay in the "redesign" scope of FAA, they couldn't change the height of the aircraft, so the engines were mounted more forward on the wings. This necessitated the MCAS system that led to failures. Oh, and Boeing left the MCAS info out of the flight manual so the FAA wouldn't catch on to how different the aircraft was. If the FAA would have known, then there is a highly likely chance the aircraft would have had to go through the full FAA certification process. This was ALL on Boeing, not anyone else.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)