Started By
Message

re: Boeing, not Spirit, mis-installed piece that blew off Alaska MAX 9 jet, industry source sa

Posted on 1/25/24 at 5:35 am to
Posted by Scuttle But
Member since Nov 2023
1301 posts
Posted on 1/25/24 at 5:35 am to
quote:

The issues are tied to design, part manufacturers and sub contractors. Boeing is largely just the assembler of the aircraft who puts their name on the aggregation of sourced parts.



1) Boeing designed the part

2) Boeing is responsible for choosing and getting its suppliers

3) In this particular case the part was assembled incorrectly by Boeing at a Boeing plant.
This post was edited on 1/25/24 at 5:37 am
Posted by weptiger
Georgia
Member since Feb 2007
10403 posts
Posted on 1/25/24 at 6:02 am to
quote:

1) Boeing designed the part

2) Boeing is responsible for choosing and getting its suppliers

3) In this particular case the part was assembled incorrectly by Boeing at a Boeing plant.


Understood, the point being made was that Boeing doesn’t “manufacture” the planes in the truest sense of the word. There was no intent to insinuate that Boeing has no responsibility for their product.
This post was edited on 1/25/24 at 6:03 am
Posted by nick__21
Member since Jan 2020
169 posts
Posted on 2/11/24 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

1) Boeing designed the part


Surprisingly that is not the case for Boeing anymore. The first issue they had with the MAX crashes was a software issue and they didn't write the software themselves, they outsourced it to and Indian company.

Look at the 787 most of the part were designed and built by foreign companies. The 787 is probably more a Japanese airplane than an American one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram