- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FYI, oral argument before La.SC for the St.G. case is this morning around 10/10:30 am
Posted on 1/23/24 at 2:41 pm to TheSadvocate
Posted on 1/23/24 at 2:41 pm to TheSadvocate
quote:
Correct. Here's an actual YT video of Holden getting caught lying about soliciting annexation
It was quid pro quo. The city told the mall and the casino they couldn’t have a bus stop if they didn’t want to be part of the city.
2
Posted on 1/23/24 at 2:46 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
It was quid pro quo. The city told the mall and the casino they couldn’t have a bus stop if they didn’t want to be part of the city.
I remember L’auberge started getting bus service right after that.
Another property owner was promised road lighting if he would let his property be taken into the city so they could connect to Siegen Village.
There was a lot of deals being cut.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 2:55 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
It was quid pro quo. The city told the mall and the casino they couldn’t have a bus stop if they didn’t want to be part of the city.
The mall would have been better off without one.
Not sure about the casino.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News