Started By
Message

re: Going for 2 in that situation.

Posted on 1/22/24 at 4:15 pm to
Posted by theCAW
Polk County
Member since Dec 2023
2647 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 4:15 pm to
Mathematically it makes sense sure if you assume 50% odds but not sure where this percent is coming from besides people saying “you either make it or you don’t”

What I see is a high risk high reward strategy. If your kicker sucks it’s the right move.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6968 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Mathematically it makes sense sure if you assume 50% odds but not sure where this percent is coming from

In 2023, teams were successful on 2-point conversions 70 out of 127 times (55%).

we are rounding down from 55% to 50%. even rounding down it still makes sense to go for it
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42727 posts
Posted on 1/22/24 at 5:08 pm to
It works even if you’re bad at 2 point conversion success rate with 40%.
Assuming you make your kicks:

Scenario 1 - Go for it, get it (40%); kick it next time - 40% win
Scenario 2 - Go for it, don’t get it (60%); go for it, get it (40%) - OT - 24% of the time; split the wins 12% each
Scenario 3 - Go for it, don’t get it (60%); go for it, don’t get it (60%) - 36% loss

So 52% vs. 48%. Again, this is if you’re bad at 2 point conversions and have XPs as a guaranteed make the math still tells you to go for it.

I feel like when people don’t understand the math they just tend to call it analytics.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram