Started By
Message

re: Let's unpack the NIL problem shall we?

Posted on 1/11/24 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
10453 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

yes there is. Start paying players directly and all incoming freshman must sign a 2 year contract.


On what authority must they sign a two year contract?

Posted by West Bank Dan
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2010
738 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:49 pm to
There are so many ways this can go it makes your head spin. A participant in any spectator sport is an entertainer who directly or indirectly brings revenues to the university and can thus be considered employees deserving of compensation. Even the 4th stringers on the sideline are part of the show attracting the 90k ticket-buying fans in the stands so paying every player a base salary does make sense. Previously, the scholarships to attend classes, get free tutors and earn degrees were considered adequate compensation. Not any more - the market has changed.

A philosophy major can transfer with their credits to another school whenever they want - it is a free country. However, they are not employees of the school. Any pro entertainment sports league with employees is governed by rules, often to promote parity to sustain as much broad consumer interest as possible and maximize revenues. This is a business strategy, not a “woke equity play”.

As of now, the NCAA does have jurisdiction to set rules on transfers, caps on benefits provided by the schools, etc. However, NIL is no different than the endorsement money Eli Manning gets for being photographed wearing a particular wristwatch. That is free game capitalism governed by the ability to connect willing buyers with willing sellers.

I personally think NIL collectives aren’t really different than boosters contributing to an athletic department who installs sleeping pods in a locker room to entice future recruits to come entertain that school’s fans and make more money.

To sum up: I can envision the NCAA clamping down on portal movement once it starts eroding fan interest and tv ratings dip ~20%. I can see them allow and encourage extra school-provided benefits (regulated cash base salaries) for kids that sign 3-year contracts (non-transfer scholarships) with 4th and 5th year options to transfer. I can see schools adopting rules that say once you enter the portal there is no stepping back out of it - no soliciting higher pay each and every year like the Bama players are doing.

I can also see the top ~50 schools split off and make an independent “free agent league” completely outside any NCAA structure.

Bottom line: Once they allow for the complete elimination of the real or imagined bond of similar school spirit and loyalty, I will stop watching. They are killing their own golden goose…
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
45220 posts
Posted on 1/12/24 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

On what authority must they sign a two year contract?



There will be a NFL style thing set up with the SEC, Big 10 and a few others. Lets just say 50 top football schools for the discussion. They will form their own division and if a kid wants to play at that level they will have to sign that agreement. Just like the NFL has rules or rookies. If the player doesn't like it they can go to a mid level program and play under their rules. Just like if a player doesn't want play under NFL rules he can go to Canada.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram