- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DeBoer will be the guy
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:43 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:43 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Why would you assume he wouldn't raise that level to meet whatever challenge comes next?
Because he hasn't raised his recruiting from where Washington was prior. People said the same shite about Mike Leach and he never did at State in the recruiting world. Why would you assume his recruiting will get better?
quote:
Do you think Brian Kelly recruited the same level at Grand Valley State, Central Michigan, Cincinnati, Notre Dame and now LSU?
I compared what DeBoer's programs looked like recruiting wise before he got there and compared them to what he did once he got there. His actually got worse. Did Kelly's get worse from where Cincinati/Notre Dame were prior to where they were once he was there?
Let me help you
Cincinnati:
2002 99
2003 92
2004 80
2005 94
enter Brian Kelly
2007 89
2008 67
2009 60
So it looks like Cincinnati went from towards the bottom of D1 football to the middle in short order while Kelly was there
quote:
There is zero reason to think that DeBoer could not do the same. It's not like he wouldn't have an entire staff, just like Saban does now.
Seems like you're assuming just like I am but trying to pretend you're not and without any evidence to support your conclusion except "why wouldn't he." At least I'm looking at actual data to support my opinion.
This post was edited on 1/11/24 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 1/11/24 at 1:46 pm to lsufball19
quote:
Seems like you're assuming just like I am but trying to pretend you're not and without any evidence to support your conclusion except "why wouldn't he." At least I'm looking at actual data to support my opinion.
You are assuming that he will not. I am assuming that he could, not that he will. There is no way to predict the success of any coach.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News