- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Way2Well
Posted on 1/12/24 at 9:28 am to Bricktop
Posted on 1/12/24 at 9:28 am to Bricktop
Show me the evidence for improved outcomes in humans from double blinded randomized placebo controlled trials.
I believe your thought process for offering an alternative service/treatment goes something like this:
1. Is it plausible? There is likely a biologic mechanism through which a treatment would be beneficial. For stem cells, it's the idea that your body regenerates tissue from the stem cells.
2. Is it popular?
3. Is it profitable?
4. Is it not harmful?
This is not good enough. Mechanistic data is not good evidence of anything, it's only at starting point. It almost always leads nowhere once put to the test in trials. High quality outcome data is all that matters, which is lacking in alternative medicine.
But please show me the outcome data you use to justify your treatments. Surely you know it well right?
You believe you are not doing harm with this thinking, yet I believe it is harmful through it's cost to patients and, more insidiously, by eroding trust in medicine.
I believe your thought process for offering an alternative service/treatment goes something like this:
1. Is it plausible? There is likely a biologic mechanism through which a treatment would be beneficial. For stem cells, it's the idea that your body regenerates tissue from the stem cells.
2. Is it popular?
3. Is it profitable?
4. Is it not harmful?
This is not good enough. Mechanistic data is not good evidence of anything, it's only at starting point. It almost always leads nowhere once put to the test in trials. High quality outcome data is all that matters, which is lacking in alternative medicine.
But please show me the outcome data you use to justify your treatments. Surely you know it well right?
You believe you are not doing harm with this thinking, yet I believe it is harmful through it's cost to patients and, more insidiously, by eroding trust in medicine.
Posted on 1/12/24 at 12:25 pm to NewOrleansBlend
quote:
u believe you are not doing harm with this thinking, yet I believe it is harmful through it's cost to patients and, more insidiously, by eroding trust in medicine.
If Covid taught me one thing, it’s not to trust Big Pharma. Profits before all. If this guy’s patients are gaining function, who gives a frick. Modern medicine is great at treating the symptoms but never the cause.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News