Started By
Message

re: Trump Barred From Making Closing Arguments.

Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:49 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26653 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Engoron agreed to the move but set boundaries, saying he was inclined to 'let everyone have his or her say.' The judge then said that Trump would have to stick to what attorneys say in closing arguments, which includes 'commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.' The former president would not be allowed to 'comment on irrelevant matters' or 'deliver a campaign speech.' He also wouldn't be allowed to criticize the judge, his staff, Attorney General James, her lawyers or the court system, Engoron wrote, according to the AP. Trump's attorney Christopher Kise told Engoron that those limitations were unfair and the ex-president could not agree to them.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80399 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

judge then said that Trump would have to stick to what attorneys say in closing arguments, which includes 'commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.' The former president would not be allowed to 'comment on irrelevant matters' or 'deliver a campaign speech.' He also wouldn't be allowed to criticize the judge, his staff, Attorney General James, her lawyers or the court system, Engoron wrote, according to the AP. Trump's attorney Christopher Kise told Engoron that those limitations were unfair and the ex-president could not agree to them.


Seems reasonable. Why does the Cult have a problem with this?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116321 posts
Posted on 1/10/24 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Engoron agreed to the move but set boundaries, saying he was inclined to 'let everyone have his or her say.' The judge then said that Trump would have to stick to what attorneys say in closing arguments, which includes 'commentary on the relevant, material facts that are in evidence, and application of the relevant law to those facts.' The former president would not be allowed to 'comment on irrelevant matters' or 'deliver a campaign speech.' He also wouldn't be allowed to criticize the judge, his staff, Attorney General James, her lawyers or the court system, Engoron wrote, according to the AP. Trump's attorney Christopher Kise told Engoron that those limitations were unfair and the ex-president could not agree to them.


This is literally what any Judge would or should do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram