Started By
Message

re: Bret Weinstein exposes the World Health Organization’s Dark Agenda

Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:20 am to
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58967 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

What does this mean? All treaties have to be ratified by 60 votes in the Senate and no treaty bypasses our constitution.


It’s supposedly an initiative to simply modify existing regulations, and treaty, and given we are charter members of the UN, and given our current leadership in place, I do not find this very unthinkable in the least. I actually think it’s quite plausible if we aren’t very aware of the language, and don’t hold our officials feet to the fire, and that’s why this is important to be aware of. Again, it’s being sold as modifying existing treaty and regulations for public health, and it’s not as if we haven’t sold our rights down the river for the sake of public health before to anyone demanding it of us. We willingly handed it over. It was the morally right thing to do. Remember?



Posted by iHEARTcorndogs
Island of Misfit Corndogs
Member since Oct 2023
1034 posts
Posted on 1/6/24 at 8:28 am to
Right, none of these bylaws, treaties, rules, or constitution matter when the people running things have no respect for them. You would think people would have learned this lesson after the last 3 years. We watched international law get ignored by the entire world, for instance, with the mass coercion and force of an experimental gene therapy

For Marxists and communists, it doesn’t matter what the laws are; what matters is who interprets the law

It doesn’t matter who votes. It matters who counts the votes.

Joe Biden even plagiarized Stalin on one of these talking to a camera
This post was edited on 1/6/24 at 8:31 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram