re: NIL restrictions

quote:

---

Im all for restricting NIL when we also restrict coaching salaries and how much schools make in TV money

---

I am for Teacher & student roles being maintained here, meaning one is a professional (the coach) who is being paid to teach the student (the player)

Universities, traditions, TV, the NCAA has made college football the best thing going... it is entertainment, but it's the love of school that make the fan interest what it is today. It's very special, because it's kids who are enrolled in the school playing on the field.

Competition has driven into business but it's still college athletics, not pro sports.

Student athletes have always been treated really well...

they get a free education, free training, all the opportuneness in the world for 4 years.

So they want a cut in the profits? Okay well, we didn't all agree to that, and we sure didn't agree to pay to sign players.

paying players was the #1 no no violation in the NCAA, now we're going to pretend it's okay because we will call it NIL?

It's NOT NIL if the player hasn't even enrolled or made a contribution on the field?

So- recruiting and NIL need to be separated because it's led to corruption.