Started By
Message

re: Maine SoS: I Found Trump Guilty of Thing He Wasn’t Charged with Using a Lower Standard

Posted on 1/1/24 at 10:55 am to
Posted by GeronimoBernstein
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Member since Dec 2016
320 posts
Posted on 1/1/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

A question for any of you who actually graduated from law school, what does this even mean?


I barely know which part of this absurdity is most profound. To answer your question, there are three "standards of proof" in our legal system, preponderance of evidence being the lowest and used only to find civil liability. Next is "clear and convincing" which requires more than "preponderous", and lastly, the highest standard, used in finding criminal guilt is "beyond a reasonable doubt."

But, let's get back to this absolute madness of an absurdity we're all forced to suffer. To begin, the Secretary of State in Maine of any other state is not a finder-of-fact with any business weighing evidence. And that's just for starters.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 1/1/24 at 2:14 pm to
quote:


I barely know which part of this absurdity is most profound. To answer your question, there are three "standards of proof" in our legal system, preponderance of evidence being the lowest and used only to find civil liability. Next is "clear and convincing" which requires more than "preponderous", and lastly, the highest standard, used in finding criminal guilt is "beyond a reasonable doubt."



Ok if the standard is "preponderance of evidence" when was the trial?

What defense witnesses were heard?

Does this not require a judge and an open court?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram