We are talking about 2 different things. Not surprisingly you missed it since you have a different agency.

3 weeks of practice before a game is very important. 3 weeks of practicing as a starter 9 months before the next season is not important at all. The poster I was responding to said it would be better for the program. They will have all spring and summer to practice for next season. That’s more than enough to prepare for next season. practicing as the starter now will not impact the QBs play next season, that’s the point.

quote:
A Sugar bowl is a bit better than the Reliaquest bowl.

Again it helps if you grasp the point. The point was not about the particular bowl game or even which QB should start, but whether practicing for and starting in a bowl gives a QB that was the backup this year and potentially the starter next any meaningful benefit. It does not. Just like young QBs getting some “mop up” snaps in blowouts doesn’t have any meaningful benefit or impact on whether he succeeds.

quote:
Just be honest you don't want him to play.

quote:
He is. Get over it.

I really feel sorry for people like you, that think everything is a fight or driven by some kind of agenda. Is it because you perhaps spent so much bandwidth attacking Daniels/screaming for Nussmirer that you think everyone thinks the same. It’s really a shame.

Maybe it’s a generational thing but an old Gen Xer like me I just root for the LSU. I don’t base it on who’s playing or coaching even if I wanted someone else.

As an LSU fan I’d love to see Daniels play one more time but I completely understand if he decides not to for his own future. I do not think his playing would hurt the development of Nussmirer. If Daniels opts out i hope Nussmirer does well. As for next year He’s been here for 2 years with this coaching staff, they know what they have, if he’s named the starter next year he’ll have all off season and summer to practice, he’d be fine even if Daniels plays this bowl

This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 4:11 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerKnights

Member since Jun 2011

3277 posts

Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:43 pm to H-Town Tiger

quote:
Not surprisingly you missed it since you have a different agency.

Didn't miss anything. You saying it provides no benefit is dumb. The coaches would disagree with you.

quote:
Again it helps if you grasp the point. The point was not about the particular bowl game or even which QB should start, but whether practicing for and starting in a bowl gives a QB that was the backup this year and potentially the starter next any meaningful benefit. It does not. Just like young QBs getting some “mop up” snaps in blowouts doesn’t have any meaningful benefit or impact on whether he succeeds.

Then why bother playing backup QBs at all? Apparently in game reps mean nothing. Playing week 0 means nothing. Playing in bowls means nothing. Playtime in general means nothing. Hell why even practice.

quote:
I really feel sorry for people like you, that think everything is a fight or driven by some kind of agenda. Is it because you perhaps spent so much bandwidth attacking Daniels/screaming for Nussmirer that you think everyone thinks the same. It’s really a shame.

Seems more like that's your MO and I do feel sorry for you. I wasn't active during that fight so that's your thing not mine. Stop assuming things about others or rather implying malicious intent in substitute of discourse.

quote:
if he’s named the starter next year he’ll have all off season and summer to practice, he’d be fine even if Daniels plays this bowl

If he's named the starter "next year" no he wouldn't. Also weird commentary considering you're probably one of the ones praying we bring in "competition" and push him to transfer.

This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 5:46 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board