- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If BCS were still used…..
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:21 pm to MrBarry
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:21 pm to MrBarry
No this is why it "SHOULD BE USED" humans (especially those who do not understand football) get caught up in ONE DATA SET POINT lie Head 2 Head, computers don't. Bama had the edge over Texas on SOS, most top 25 wins (4-3), most top 15 wins (3-1), better loss (#5 in old BCS vs. OU what ever they were) a stronger overall conference etc. etc.
NOTICE: the Coaches Poll who "Know Football" had Texas and Bama tied, and that after all the Propaganda of Head 2 Head trumps everything else.
With the added emphasis on players missing, Texas should have gotten 4th, IMHO, over FSU, but they should not be ahead of Bama only because of Head 2 Head.
NOTICE: the Coaches Poll who "Know Football" had Texas and Bama tied, and that after all the Propaganda of Head 2 Head trumps everything else.
With the added emphasis on players missing, Texas should have gotten 4th, IMHO, over FSU, but they should not be ahead of Bama only because of Head 2 Head.
1
Posted on 12/7/23 at 7:53 pm to TTOWN RONMON
If head 2 head isn’t the most important data point when teams have equal records why bother playing??
Head to head results are literally the ONLY reason to play the freaking sport
Head to head results are literally the ONLY reason to play the freaking sport
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News