Started By
Message

re: If BCS were still used…..

Posted on 12/7/23 at 3:38 pm to
Posted by MrBarry
Member since Sep 2023
432 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

3. Alabama
4. Florida State
5. Texas


And this is why we don't use the BCS anymore.
The whole point of the playoff committee was SUPPOSED to be so we could instill some common sense into the computer rankings. At least that's what most of us thought originally.

No P5 team is ranked ahead of a P5 team with less losses, except Bama ahead of FSU.

If two teams have the same record, the team that won H2H is ranked higher, except Bama over Texas.


Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
25048 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

No P5 team is ranked ahead of a P5 team with less losses, except Bama ahead of FSU.


That’s not true. In fact LSU is an example that disproves your statement.
Posted by TTOWN RONMON
Member since Oct 2023
514 posts
Posted on 12/7/23 at 5:21 pm to
No this is why it "SHOULD BE USED" humans (especially those who do not understand football) get caught up in ONE DATA SET POINT lie Head 2 Head, computers don't. Bama had the edge over Texas on SOS, most top 25 wins (4-3), most top 15 wins (3-1), better loss (#5 in old BCS vs. OU what ever they were) a stronger overall conference etc. etc.

NOTICE: the Coaches Poll who "Know Football" had Texas and Bama tied, and that after all the Propaganda of Head 2 Head trumps everything else.

With the added emphasis on players missing, Texas should have gotten 4th, IMHO, over FSU, but they should not be ahead of Bama only because of Head 2 Head.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram