- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’m still irrationally angry about the targeting on Sam
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:03 am to LSBoosie
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:03 am to LSBoosie
quote:
They really need to implement a targeting 1 (no ejection) and targeting 2 (ejection). I feel like that’s such an easy fix for a rule that has a lot of grey area.
Sam’s play shouldn’t qualify for either.
1
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:32 am to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
Sam’s play shouldn’t qualify for either.
I think Sam’s was in the grey area I’m talking about. There’s no way to measure what exactly is considered the “crown of the helmet”. They can use player safety as the reason, tack on 15 yards and be done with it. There’s no reason anyone should be ejected for a hit like that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News