Started By
Message

re: I’m still irrationally angry about the targeting on Sam

Posted on 11/13/23 at 7:59 am to
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
8025 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 7:59 am to
They really need to implement a targeting 1 (no ejection) and targeting 2 (ejection). I feel like that’s such an easy fix for a rule that has a lot of grey area.
Posted by jpainter6174
Boss city
Member since Feb 2014
5343 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:00 am to
Call the SEC office and tell them how you feel, I did!
Posted by Pikes Peak Tiger
Colorado Springs
Member since Jun 2023
4041 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:03 am to
quote:

They really need to implement a targeting 1 (no ejection) and targeting 2 (ejection). I feel like that’s such an easy fix for a rule that has a lot of grey area.


Sam’s play shouldn’t qualify for either.
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
8708 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

They really need to implement a targeting 1 (no ejection) and targeting 2 (ejection). I feel like that’s such an easy fix for a rule that has a lot of grey area.

Yep, but can we really expect the ncaa to implement anything logical? Criminal frickin organization.

Since they’ve implemented the targeting rule, I’d say about 98% of targeting penalties + ejections are unintentional hits that shouldn’t not warrant an ejection. It’s terrible that they are ejecting players who are just trying to put out game film to make it to the next level.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram