- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Those Who Defended Our 2008 OOC Schedule
Posted on 12/2/08 at 11:31 pm to Obi-Wan Tiger
Posted on 12/2/08 at 11:31 pm to Obi-Wan Tiger
You're joking, right?
Even with the weak OCC schedule, if LSU were to have been denied after playing UF, SC, Bama and UG, they're just fricking morons. Same with UF, and their loss was to Ole Miss, not a major player as far as the national scene is.
Why does USC get to be propped up playing WHAT WAS ONCE a good OOC schedule while playing in conference chumps.
For the football impaired:
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE QUALITY OF THE OCC SCHEDULE IS, AS LONG AS A TEAM PLAYS QUALITY OPPONENTS, AND SEC SCHOOLS PLAY MORE THAN ANYONE.
Don't believe me? Look at the rankings. Thaqt'a all that really shuld matter when it comes to "quality of schedule."
I think they want SEC schools to be beaten down with week in - week out top notch opponents while other, more profitable teams roll over pussy conference teams in between powder puff opponents.
frick 'em.
Even with the weak OCC schedule, if LSU were to have been denied after playing UF, SC, Bama and UG, they're just fricking morons. Same with UF, and their loss was to Ole Miss, not a major player as far as the national scene is.
Why does USC get to be propped up playing WHAT WAS ONCE a good OOC schedule while playing in conference chumps.
For the football impaired:
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE QUALITY OF THE OCC SCHEDULE IS, AS LONG AS A TEAM PLAYS QUALITY OPPONENTS, AND SEC SCHOOLS PLAY MORE THAN ANYONE.
Don't believe me? Look at the rankings. Thaqt'a all that really shuld matter when it comes to "quality of schedule."
I think they want SEC schools to be beaten down with week in - week out top notch opponents while other, more profitable teams roll over pussy conference teams in between powder puff opponents.
frick 'em.
2
Posted on 12/2/08 at 11:35 pm to blueboy
Right after we get this coaching staff debacle fixed the Rant needs to turn its attention to upgrading the OOC schedule (and then to purging TS from piped-in music).
Posted on 12/2/08 at 11:40 pm to blueboy
quote:
You're joking, right?
No, I'm not.
quote:
if LSU were to have been denied after playing UF, SC, Bama and UG, they're just fricking morons. Same with UF, and their loss was to Ole Miss, not a major player as far as the national scene is.
Tell it to the BCS. Like I said originally, if there is even a remote possibility of UF being denied, when they played and beat two BCS conference opponents, what makes you think we'd have any chance with the shite we played?
quote:
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE QUALITY OF THE OCC SCHEDULE IS, AS LONG AS A TEAM PLAYS QUALITY OPPONENTS,
wait, you're saying beating VT didn't matter last year? we don't get to the title game without it. and also, did you miss 2004 AU not getting in?
quote:
SEC SCHOOLS PLAY MORE THAN ANYONE.
Typically, but not this year. You're not seriously throwing SC in with UF and Bama are you?
quote:
I think they want SEC schools to be beaten down with week in - week out top notch opponents
That's definitely not what I was suggesting...decent opponents, a couple from BCS conferences preferably. Doesn't have to be juggernauts.
This post was edited on 12/2/08 at 11:55 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News