Started By
Message

re: GM delays start of EV production at Michigan plant due to lack of demand

Posted on 10/20/23 at 4:04 pm to
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12704 posts
Posted on 10/20/23 at 4:04 pm to
Go look at the weight of a model 3 vs a 3 series.

Also your discount rate for the 200 fee is incorrect. States are doing flat fees at higher rates because it’s political and people like ones in these thread lap up sticking it to ev owners and because they’re too lazy to do anything else.

I’m happy to see your math to prove me wrong though.
This post was edited on 10/20/23 at 4:06 pm
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
12704 posts
Posted on 10/21/23 at 12:17 am to
I guess no one wants to do the math on that?
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25906 posts
Posted on 10/21/23 at 2:16 am to
quote:

Go look at the weight of a model 3 vs a 3 series.





Trucks do tend to be significantly heavier than their ICE counterparts but EV and ICE cars within a class tend to be reasonably close at least not enough to cause any significant increase in road wear. Most roads are built to handle 40 ton truck travel so even an extra 2000 pounds does not cause any significant difference in wear. Most roads don't fail from just surface wear anyway it is almost always significant areas of base failure. Roadways like interstates with high construction standards to tend to reach the end of service life due to wear though.

EVs should pay their fair share of road taxes and you are correct that some of the flat fees are higher that one pays for a similar ICE vehicle driving an average number of miles per year.
This post was edited on 10/21/23 at 2:18 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram