Started By
Message

re: How Should Israel Apply the Law of Armed Conflict During the Siege of Gaza?

Posted on 10/12/23 at 4:46 pm to
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
8330 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 4:46 pm to
In 2006, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank. In 2007, Hamas led a military victory over Fatah, the secular Palestinian nationalist party, which had dominated the Palestinian National Authority.

Elections matter.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41291 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

In 2006, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank


The West Bank is not controlled by Hamas, Palestinian Authority has controlled the West Bank since the 90s.
Posted by Shakey
Member since Sep 2023
107 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

In 2006, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank. In 2007, Hamas led a military victory over Fatah, the secular Palestinian nationalist party, which had dominated the Palestinian National Authority.

Elections matter.
Partly true, but Hamas hasn't allowed another election in 16 years.
Posted by Shakey
Member since Sep 2023
107 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

In 2006, Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank. In 2007, Hamas led a military victory over Fatah, the secular Palestinian nationalist party, which had dominated the Palestinian National Authority.

Elections matter.

I understand your point. Consider this hypothetical:

President Biden and his Democrat administration order a secret attack on Russia. Russia responds by seiging America with a barrage of indiscriminate rockets and missiles in preparation for a full-scale ground invasion. The Biden administration orders a stop on all Americans attempting to flee the U.S. and avoid the war. There is no way out and all civilians and their families are forced to remain in the conflict zone.

Although Russia has an obligation to mitigate civilian casualties, they use the same rationale you proposed. Does that change the calculation?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram