Started By
Message

re: Legal question for fun - Boebart and her Beetlejuice handy

Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:10 am to
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8415 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:10 am to
quote:

So criminals should challenge any nighttime security footage of them committing crimes because it was dark


She wasn’t charged with anything criminal.

The question is should the photos have been released, not did she get caught doing something illegal.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:20 am to
quote:

She wasn’t charged with anything criminal.

The question is should the photos have been released, not did she get caught doing something illegal.


Don't get caught on the legal v illegal part. She has no expectation of privacy just because it is dark.
Posted by redneck hippie
Stillwater
Member since Dec 2008
5622 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

The question is should the photos have been released


Consider she accused the theater of lying about her vaping and being unruly
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11346 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

She wasn’t charged with anything criminal. The question is should the photos have been released, not did she get caught doing something illegal.


A) I think they may have been public record and not able to be concealed

B) if they are actually private it’s a good lesson in apologizing and moving on instead of lying to cover yourself and make the business look bad as they would have the right to clarify the situation

On both counts, yes, every right to release the film

You’re welcome to counter.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram