Started By
Message

re: When would you all recommend getting a new car?

Posted on 9/14/23 at 2:17 pm to
Posted by lsujro
north of the wall
Member since Jul 2007
3927 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Sounds like you just had a lead foot because the previous gen pilot is rated for 20mpg city, there's no way those 2 should be within 1 mpg of each other unless it's driver error or simply not comparing similar routes.

It's not a GIGANTIC difference between body on frame large suvs and 3 row unibody but 20-30% adds up up to a significant amount over time in fuel savings, especially for driving a vehicle you simply don't even need and paid way more for up front if you're not using it for towing or have 3+ kids. People will rationalize anything to drive the vehicles they do.



the mileage readings are from the same driver driving the same routes in two vehicles. mpg ratings are a joke. if you think they are accurate you cannot have a serious discussion about vehicle mpg.

i'm not rationalizing anything. I'm fully aware there is a slight difference in mileage, and it is more pronounced in interstate driving. There are a million other ways to cost/save yourself a couple thousand dollars over a period of several years. It's a shocking thought, but sometimes people pay extra money for nicer or more comfortable things. I'd say the guy driving a foreign luxury vehicle (with msrp comparable to a large domestic suv) shouldn't be throwing stones at the glass house of necessity guiding one's choice of vehicles


Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68662 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

and it is more pronounced in interstate driving.


Still a difference in city driving as well.

While going from 16 to 19 doesnt seem like much in raw mpg, it's a near 20% increase in mileage. No different than say going from 22 to 26 mpg.

Again, no one is really going to buy the story a Pilot is getting the same mileage as a big body on frame 3 row gas SUV. Maybe a VERY old Pilot but not a more recent one that's rated at like 20 city 26-27 highway. You were driving it like a dog to get that poor of mileage.

quote:

I'd say the guy driving a foreign luxury vehicle (with msrp comparable to a large domestic suv) shouldn't be throwing stones at the glass house of necessity guiding one's choice of vehicles


The MDX isn't really a "luxury" vehicle. It's a "premium" Pilot. Luxury is something like a BMW X7 or MB GLS, etc...something way more than an MDX costs. The MDX is just a slight upcharge from a Honda Pilot, even today it starts UNDER $50k...or still thousands less than the price of a stripped out poverty spec Tahoe/Expedition (which dont really exist anyways). People arent buying $55k new Tahoes or Expeditions, they are spending way more.

Also we bought our 2014 MDX in 2017 for $25k with 39k miles on it. So I will gladly still say buying a brand new body on frame 3 row SUV makes NO sense for a 1-2 kid family with no major towing requirement and is just a huge waste of money not only up front but over time (MPGs) when you could get essentially top trim level 3 row unibody SUVs for thousands less than the stripped out non-existent 3 row body on frame Expeditions/Tahoes. They are just a gigantic waste of money without multiple kids (3+) or an actual towing requirement...and I dont mean towing a 5k RV once a year somewhere either which you could rent something for anyways


Also again it's not a "coule thousand dollars" over a few years. If we're talking new here, you're saving A TON of money over a few years, not just in fuel but in the actual cost of the vehicle of saying buying a $45k 3 row minivan or unibody 3 row SUV vs. a $65k body on frame 3 row SUV. Up front you're already down $20k, now every year you're probably throwing away another $750-$1k on gas.

Do a 5 year loan at say 5% financing say $25k vs. $45k (assuming $20k down/trade on both). $28.3k on the $25k loan over 5 years vs. $50.8k on the $45k over 5 year. So after 5 years, you've now paid $22.5k more for the car, and another $3500-$5000 more in gas. This isnt even factoring in depreciation which will be worse over time on the Ford/Chevy body on frame more expensive vehicle as well. financially just a really dumb choice unless you absolutely need that kind of space or towing requirement.
This post was edited on 9/14/23 at 3:34 pm
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84484 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

the mileage readings are from the same driver driving the same routes in two vehicles. mpg ratings are a joke. if you think they are accurate you cannot have a serious discussion about vehicle mpg.

i'm not rationalizing anything. I'm fully aware there is a slight difference in mileage, and it is more pronounced in interstate driving. There are a million other ways to cost/save yourself a couple thousand dollars over a period of several years. It's a shocking thought, but sometimes people pay extra money for nicer or more comfortable things. I'd say the guy driving a foreign luxury vehicle (with msrp comparable to a large domestic suv) shouldn't be throwing stones at the glass house of necessity guiding one's choice of vehicles


No offnse, but you're clueless
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425567 posts
Posted on 9/14/23 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

I'd say the guy driving a foreign luxury vehicle (with msrp comparable to a large domestic suv)

You can get a lightly used (like 30k or less miles) MDX for around $30k. Tell me how comparable that is to a Tahoe/Expedition with the same year/mileage

I'll go on autotempest right now and look if you want. Just give me the zip and range.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram