- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 9/4/23 at 7:04 pm to SloaneRanger
Boy, sure looks easy from the stands don't it ?
Posted on 9/4/23 at 7:21 pm to SloaneRanger
Both can be true here. I wanted Daniels to be the guy so badly with his electric running ability, but he just isn’t the guy.
Did he cost us the game, no, did he hurt us, yes.
For everyone blaming the playcalling, which was suspect at times, go back and watch Purdue. The offensive play calls are different when Nuss is in, to take advantage of his throwing ability.
Daniels can not, attack the middle of the field or down the sidelines with any consistency. The drop by Brian was on Daniels, yes he should’ve caught it, but a crappy throw that allowed the DB to get back in coverage and break the line of sight caused it more. Don’t forget the announcers literally 3 times saying Nabors 1 on 1 down the sideline was open and Daniels threw two terrible and uncatchable balls.
Nuss may not be the answer, but at this point he is the future and 100% deserves to start against Grambling as a prove it game. Daniels can be electric in the redzone, especially if they play some wildcat with Nuss and him switching off with him originally at WR.
Did he cost us the game, no, did he hurt us, yes.
For everyone blaming the playcalling, which was suspect at times, go back and watch Purdue. The offensive play calls are different when Nuss is in, to take advantage of his throwing ability.
Daniels can not, attack the middle of the field or down the sidelines with any consistency. The drop by Brian was on Daniels, yes he should’ve caught it, but a crappy throw that allowed the DB to get back in coverage and break the line of sight caused it more. Don’t forget the announcers literally 3 times saying Nabors 1 on 1 down the sideline was open and Daniels threw two terrible and uncatchable balls.
Nuss may not be the answer, but at this point he is the future and 100% deserves to start against Grambling as a prove it game. Daniels can be electric in the redzone, especially if they play some wildcat with Nuss and him switching off with him originally at WR.
Posted on 9/4/23 at 7:24 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
Understand what you are saying, but there are bigger problems.
Everyone keeps saying this like downplaying the issue that our starting QB can’t get us in the end zone isn’t a major issue. It’s a massive issue; especially with a clearly deficient defense. This team will only win by putting up a bunch of points. He simply can’t.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News