Started By
Message

re: The RICO act. What it says

Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:30 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425080 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

the point is the intent of both GA’s and the federal RICO statutes were to go after organized crime, not people who challenge elections.

Well that wasn't the point of bringing up "interstate commerce", which started the federal/state discussion tree.

But, again: tomato/tomato.

If the allegations are proven, this was a criminal organization/enterprise. Same as organized crime.

ETA: had to bold so sky screamers didn't melt down
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 8:33 am
Posted by Buddy Red
Maringouin, LA
Member since Aug 2007
279 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:36 am to
This RICO thread reminds me of a book called "Three Felonies a Day". Premise is under the monumentally large collection of Federal Statutes [criminal] on the books today, any prosecutor could potentially charge ANY citizen with 3 Felonies a day. Somewhere in beginning of the book it discusses prosecutors bragging and betting on such things, if I recall correctly.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20060 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Well that wasn't the point of bringing up "interstate commerce", which started the federal/state discussion tree.


Nope, that’s not what was said. The argument was that politics was not commerce, nothing to do with interstate.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
13169 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 10:20 am to
quote:

If the allegations are proven


By ‘proven’ you mean getting a jury of leftists to convict republicans no matter what.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram