Started By
Message

re: The RICO act. What it says

Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:28 am to
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
13168 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:28 am to
quote:

I have no idea how he’s getting down votes for pointing out the simple fact.


Because the point isn’t that they’re GA RICO statutes as opposed to federal, the point is the intent of both GA’s and the federal RICO statutes were to go after organized crime, not people who challenge elections.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425080 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

the point is the intent of both GA’s and the federal RICO statutes were to go after organized crime, not people who challenge elections.

Well that wasn't the point of bringing up "interstate commerce", which started the federal/state discussion tree.

But, again: tomato/tomato.

If the allegations are proven, this was a criminal organization/enterprise. Same as organized crime.

ETA: had to bold so sky screamers didn't melt down
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 8:33 am
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

not people who challenge elections.

challenging happens in courts.
these 19 people did not challenge the Georgia election result.

Arizona was challenged and we got ninjas to do deep forensics. spectacularly, the result was a Biden win by even more than the official count.

the Georgia case is about activity to overthrow the election. none of those 19 asswipes thought they had really won.
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 8:47 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram