- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The RICO act. What it says
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:28 am to Meauxjeaux
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:28 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
I have no idea how he’s getting down votes for pointing out the simple fact.
Because the point isn’t that they’re GA RICO statutes as opposed to federal, the point is the intent of both GA’s and the federal RICO statutes were to go after organized crime, not people who challenge elections.
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:30 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
the point is the intent of both GA’s and the federal RICO statutes were to go after organized crime, not people who challenge elections.
Well that wasn't the point of bringing up "interstate commerce", which started the federal/state discussion tree.
But, again: tomato/tomato.
If the allegations are proven, this was a criminal organization/enterprise. Same as organized crime.
ETA: had to bold so sky screamers didn't melt down
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 8:33 am
Posted on 8/16/23 at 8:45 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
not people who challenge elections.
challenging happens in courts.
these 19 people did not challenge the Georgia election result.
Arizona was challenged and we got ninjas to do deep forensics. spectacularly, the result was a Biden win by even more than the official count.
the Georgia case is about activity to overthrow the election. none of those 19 asswipes thought they had really won.
This post was edited on 8/16/23 at 8:47 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News