- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Top 5 class incoming...
Posted on 7/31/23 at 6:29 am to JiminyCricket
Posted on 7/31/23 at 6:29 am to JiminyCricket
quote:
Receipts are a bitch, aren’t they?
You can’t possibly be this dumb. Here’s how the conversation went.
OP: Top 5 class incoming
Me: a top 5 class is virtually impossible. Even a literal perfect finish only gives us a class score that would’ve ranked in the 8-10 range last year.
—————
Some other guy (to me): even without Mack, they’ll finish between 5-7.
Me (to some other guy): without Mack, I bet you they will finish outside the top 8
—————
You (to me): you’re wrong when you say landing all those guys would only give us a class score that would be 8th-10th last year. I added it up and they’d be 8th. So you’re wrong
Me (to you): dude you literally just confirmed exactly what I said
You(to me): quotes me out of context telling a different guy that lll bet him we don’t finish top 8 without Mack in th class. Says “receipts are a bitch” as if you didn’t just completely prove yourself wrong
ETA: I also find it amusing that you immediately upvote your own comments as soon as you post them lol dork
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 6:34 am
Posted on 7/31/23 at 6:58 am to LifeAquatic
Go ahead and call me whatever you like. Doesn’t change the fact that you came in here after OP said top 5 class incoming and said…..”guarantee you we will not be in the top 8. The numbers just straight up are not possible if we lose Wardell mack.”
That’s just not accurate if the last 3 cycles are any indication.
ETA:
What you actually said…..
Too bad you actually said you guarantee they won’t be a top 8. Don’t change up what you said to make it fit now. You guaranteed they wouldn’t make a top 8. That’s where I disagreed with you.
Nope, you said they likely end up 12th and guaranteed they wouldn’t be top 8. I did the math and you were wrong. It’s okay to be wrong sometimes.
Oh, and last of all, before you start your work week this Monday morning, frick you.
That’s just not accurate if the last 3 cycles are any indication.
ETA:
quote:
Some other guy (to me): even without Mack, they’ll finish between 5-7. Me (to some other guy): without Mack, I bet you they will finish outside the top 8
What you actually said…..
quote:
You want to bet me? I guarantee you we will not be in the top 8. The numbers just straight up are not possible if we lose Wardell mack.
Too bad you actually said you guarantee they won’t be a top 8. Don’t change up what you said to make it fit now. You guaranteed they wouldn’t make a top 8. That’s where I disagreed with you.
quote:
You (to me): you’re wrong when you say landing all those guys would only give us a class score that would be 8th-10th last year. I added it up and they’d be 8th. So you’re wrong Me (to you): dude you literally just confirmed exactly what I said
Nope, you said they likely end up 12th and guaranteed they wouldn’t be top 8. I did the math and you were wrong. It’s okay to be wrong sometimes.
Oh, and last of all, before you start your work week this Monday morning, frick you.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 7:09 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News