I have very rarely engaged you on this subject because of your lack of objectivity and my lack of desire of the subject itself.

EVEN in the WORST scenario, it's not a big deal. Richard Ramriez claimed to be running a Satanic Cult, too. I have never argued small cells of pathological actors haven't claimed to be occult Satanists. It's a small population that often has mental illness and a lack of true sincerity.

Just like how I fully admit there are very rare cases of "Stranger danger" and children being taken and sexually exploited. I mean look at Elizabeth Smart. That doesn't mean the meme exists on any real, statistical level, and certainly doesn't appear at the rate of the mythos.

So feel free to talk about Damien Echols all you want. It doesn't really matter in the larger discussion I'm having.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by blueboy

Member since Apr 2006

56567 posts

Posted on 7/5/23 at 9:51 am to SlowFlowPro

quote:
I have never argued small cells of pathological actors haven't claimed to be occult Satanists. It's a small population that often has mental illness and a lack of true sincerity.

That's how I'd feel about it too, if it weren't for the fact that Hollywood, knowing all of the evidence, still moved heaven and earth and produced not one, not two but three 'documentaries' (the third produced by Peter Jackson) trying to get the murderers off.

But yeah that's off topic.

As to the movie, I'm not sure why you'd post so passionately about partisanship in a thread about a movie you haven't seen. Nowhere in the promos have I seen anything about liberals or democrats being the perps. It's about an actual case of child exploitation. Kids do get abducted. It is a problem, and no, it's not just closed-minded parents who won't accept their gay kids. In fact, if the kids are gay, I'd say it's already too late.

1 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board