Started By
Message

re: Starfield Info/Discussion Thread

Posted on 6/28/23 at 7:41 am to
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 6/28/23 at 7:41 am to
I guess that does stink if true but I'll honestly have an easier time getting over it than you guys.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27204 posts
Posted on 6/28/23 at 8:02 am to
quote:

I guess that does stink if true but I'll honestly have an easier time getting over it than you guys.


What do you mean, if true? I took that screenshot

These were my two posts that accompanied it:

quote:

Just finished Jedi: Survivor, and I’ve gotta say, I now really understand the HWU comparison of native/DLSS/FSR. Prior to this, I had never used FSR because there was no reason to use it over DLSS, which I had access to. With J:S being an AMD sponsored game, I was limited to FSR, and honestly, I just wasn’t particularly impressed. It’s fine. The performance gain is worth using over native. But it was noticeably worse than any recent implementation of DLSS 2.x. Some areas looked really great, but sizzling and ghosting were downright immersion breaking at certain points, and I say that as someone who always uses DLSS Quality over native. I’m pulling for AMD to continue closing the gap, but FSR still has a ways to go before it’s a true challenge to DLSS.

quote:

I was playing at 1440x3440, and yeah, kinda meh. Again, probably worth the degradation on average for the performance boost, but definitely more of a compromise than DLSS. Sizzling is really hard to catch in a screenshot, but ghosting was so bad on one elevator that I felt compelled to take one:
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram