Started By
Message

re: A reminder that zipper merging is how your supposed to handle merging

Posted on 3/24/23 at 10:39 am to
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
6844 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 10:39 am to
quote:

quote:
Post your face when you realize what you described is just moving the merge (conflict point) to the "lane closed 1 mile ahead" sign instead of the barricade
No dumbass, you have a mile or more to merge if the signs are earlier.

Not merging 100 fricking feet before the lane closure like you zipper fricking heads.


No one is suggesting to merge 100 ft before the lane runs out. There are people that do and they can frick off because they too are causing traffic to back up. However, everyone merging super early defeats the whole point of having two lanes. There's a reason for a mile notice, which is to give drivers time to continue at normal speeds and find an appropriate sized gap to merge into. Some cars will have an opening immediately and should move over, others will need to continue to drive for a moment. If everyone in the continuing lane had the mindset to make merge space and people in the closing lane had the mindset to find an opening, all while continuing normal driving speed, this would effectively be zipper merging.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29827 posts
Posted on 3/24/23 at 10:48 am to
quote:

There's a reason for a mile notice, which is to give drivers time to continue at normal speeds and find an appropriate sized gap to merge into.
Exactly. But the majority of the people in the closure lane don’t do that! They drive faster in the closure lane until the fricking last couple hundred feet and cut people off in the open lane causing them to brake, thus causing a traffic jam.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram