re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

quote:

---

you insist that there is some benefit to the additional effort and cost of recruiting and coordinating men dressed as women to come read the book.

---

I never insisted this, not once.

What I have said is that we do not exist in a society or country where speech is a reverse onus right.

It is not up to me or anyone else to prove they have the right to any particular form of speech, be it a man in a dress reading a book or a youth pastor starting a summer camp or preaching to kids. That right of speech is the default. Therefore it is on you, not me, to prove that such speech should be restricted and why.

So far, you have not offered a single reason or piece of evidence for that.