re: Famed atheist and biologist calls the idea of more than two genders “utter nonsense”

quote:

---

I'm not the one claiming that men in dresses reading Clifford does harm to children and trying to ban it, you are.

---

Nice try, "scientist." You want to change the paradigm and start doing something different that will - assumedly - offer more benefits for developing children. Do you understand how science works?

I said to show us the evidence that drag queen story hour is a net positive for a child's literary development over a reader who isn't a drag queen. Why is this programming necessary and beneficial for kids?

Or to phrase it a bit more bluntly: who the frick even decided that drag queens and children's storybook hour should be combined? They clearly are not birds of a feather (except to a pedophile, I suppose...). So what was the goal and intended outcome?