Started By
Message

Up To 40 Million Firearms Could Be Banned Overnight

Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:40 am
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
10606 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:40 am
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/40-million-firearms-could-be-banned-overnight-due-new-atf-brace-rules

Up To 40 Million Firearms Could Be Banned Overnight Due To New ATF Brace Rules

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is set to release its final rule on Braced firearms later this month.

In Analyzing the proposed rule, which was released June 2021, it appears that ATF has intentionally designed its Factoring Criteria for Rifled Barrel Weapons with Accessories Commonly Referred to as "Stabilizing Braces" to effect a complete ban of every pistol-braced firearm currently on the market.

Masquerading as a helpful rulemaking "to assist" gun owners and the firearms industry in complying with the law, in reality the proposed rule is designed with the obvious and specific intent to largely outlaw the use of stabilizing braces on firearms, threatening millions of current owners with imprisonment and putting a large segment of the gun industry out of business entirely.

To accomplish this goal, the proposed rule creates "Worksheet 4999," which contains three sections of analysis, each more restrictive than the last, designed to ensure that virtually no stabilizing brace is eligible for use on a non-rifle firearm, and thereafter ensuring that most firearms do not qualify to even use an allowed stabilizing brace.

Even if a firearm passes the checks listed in "Worksheet 4999" ATF reserves unto itself the unbridled discretion to override the results of the worksheet at any time and for any reason, creating a system where no person or company could possibly rely on anything the agency says.

ATF in their proposed rulemaking claims that the number of Stabilizing braces in circulation is around 7-9 million. Whereas the Congressional Research Service estimates that the actual number of braces in circulation is anywhere between 10 – 40 million.

If this proposed rule becomes law, millions of gun owners could find themselves in possession of illegal, unregistered short barreled rifles or shotguns overnight.

ATF attempted once before to effectively ban pistol braces in 2020, during the Trump administration. Because of the massive grassroots response to the rule change, ATF abandoned their attempt and withdrew the rulemaking. But now that a new anti-gun regime has taken control of the White House, the ATF feels empowered to revive its war on pistol braces and essentially ban an extremely popular gun accessory
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119242 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is set to release its final rule on Braced firearms later this month.


This is what they are trying to ban?

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:44 am to
Damn, well I recently lost my .22 mini gun in an unfortunate boating accident.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35214 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:44 am to
I seriously wish nothing but pain and suffering on each and every ATF agent and their immediate families.

Natural pain and suffering, of course. Like, they stub their toe every single day or some shite like that. So… not a threat or anything.
Posted by the_truman_shitshow
Member since Aug 2021
2755 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:44 am to
Look at what Trudeau/Castro is doing in Canada.

Stricter gun ownership laws in Canada per Trudeau cabinet

It's obvious that these globalists are continuously applying more pressure for control/confiscation of privately owned firearms at a global scale which means that they are uniformly and enacting these policies from a centralized origin...
Posted by angryslugs
Member since Apr 2008
10217 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:44 am to
Shall not be infringed.

Btw.. does the Supreme Court EPA ruling make this one invalid?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71611 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:45 am to
The anti-gun groups have been getting their asses handed to them lately from what I have seen.
Posted by PhillyTiger90
Member since Dec 2015
10754 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:47 am to
Im sure the south side of Chicago will be cleaned up overnight because of this "ban". Because everyone knows criminals will always follow the law
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5832 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 9:50 am to
The rule will not be constitutional under the current case law.
Posted by BigMob
Georgia
Member since Oct 2021
7625 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:14 am to
This is such horseshite that a three letter agency can whimsically decide how they want to infringe on a clear cut constitutional amendment.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
85901 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:16 am to
ATF is not a law making/passing entity and should be 100% defunded, removed and the govt have class action lawsuits opened up for their abuse.
Posted by Eugene Fullstack
9,500' MSL
Member since Nov 2022
82 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:42 am to
I will not comply - your move squirt
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
53931 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 10:43 am to
You do realize that an attempt to pass or enforce a gun law gives the citizen the right to kill the person enforcing the law right?
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25748 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:03 am to
Baby steps.

Slippery slope.

Hell yes we’ll take your guns!!
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51917 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:05 am to
Someone needs to introduce the ATF to the 2nd Amendment. "Shall not be infringed" is about as concrete as it gets.
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
5097 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:06 am to
Meanwhile, illegally owned handguns are taking out multitudes every single day without comment.

It's not hard to see why the federal government goes after the specific things they do.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67249 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:10 am to
Under what act of congress was the ATF delegated this authority? Such a ruling should immediately be challenged under the same logic as West Virginia vs EPA.
Posted by Kolbysfan
Tennessee
Member since Jun 2007
1828 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:34 am to
Attorney who tracks suits

Follow him. He tracks and reports out suits across the country.

I believe the suit you are referring to is this one LINK
This post was edited on 12/2/22 at 11:37 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99528 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:01 pm to
They planning on buying them? At a minimum, it constitutes a taking requiring just compensation under the 5th Amendment.

If this is a legal act (and the EPA decision calls that into doubt), it is an ex post facto law to the extent it applies to already purchased and owned firearms.
Posted by LSU12223
Member since Sep 2016
1482 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 12:37 pm to
Bet this gets shut down in SCOTUS
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram