Started By
Message

re: It’s time to accept that we need to play both QBs

Posted on 10/2/22 at 10:46 am to
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
10252 posts
Posted on 10/2/22 at 10:46 am to
quote:

If Nuss had to play even 1 more quarter we would have lost by 10+


100%

We hv idiots as fans. In the near future this might change but for now it is what it is.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24458 posts
Posted on 10/2/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

100% We hv idiots as fans. In the near future this might change but for now it is what it is.

We certainly do and you’re one of them. It was the defense that won that game they nearly lost and not the QB. If anything, Nuss would have stretched the field. Daniels is a zero risk guy and fricking would not even throw a 50/50 ball or remotely try to throw receivers open. HE HASNT DONE THAT ALL SEASON AND IT WILL GET WORSE. In 2 games Daniels will be benched
Posted by misey94
Hernando, MS
Member since Jan 2007
23394 posts
Posted on 10/2/22 at 10:54 am to
quote:

100% We hv idiots as fans. In the near future this might change but for now it is what it is.


I’m not saying Nuss is the answer and should be the starter. That said, how in the frick was he any worse last night? It’s low bar either way, but damn.

We had to depend on the run game and defense to win and the same would have been the case if Daniels hadn’t gotten hurt.
Posted by AcetylCoA
Pasadena, California
Member since Nov 2009
2654 posts
Posted on 10/2/22 at 10:55 am to
He has to be the most hyped below average QB in our life time. I could understand if they were calling for Walker Howard, but Nuss? He has 6 games of film out already and none of it is stellar. More picks than TDs and no wow moments. It’s like they are embellishing his talent level.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram