Started By
Message

re: Remove

Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:58 pm to
Posted by TigerAlum4Life
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2022
76 posts
Posted on 11/10/22 at 7:58 pm to
I disagree with that assessment on its face, although there is a little validity to your argument. However, with that argument there are a couple other schools that should be ahead of FSU that are below all of them. The ExtraInning rankings are indicative but very influenced by relationships and politics. And if you use Perfect Games rankings you have a completely different result (FSU with a 22, 25 & 41 vs 13, 18 and 38).

Aside from the controversial nature of the EI rankings I am very familiar with those kids on the FSU list and several are not worthy of those rankings compared to others in the 2023 class, including LSU's commits. LSU's list of commits collectively are far better players than those on the FSU list. Danley and Torres being the two best from what I've seen.

All of them are obviously very good, but LSU has at least 5 proven high-end, highly-skilled 2023's. FSU is not that, I can assure you. Quite familiar with every kid on this list except the Gooden kid at FSU and the Brown kid at TX.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram