- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ already looked at every document including privileged
Posted on 8/29/22 at 10:52 am to Strannix
Posted on 8/29/22 at 10:52 am to Strannix
quote:Yes, that is the PURPOSE of a filter/taint team.
DOJ already looked at every document including privileged
At least three of us told y’all last week that the filter team would have finished its review of the documents by today. They probably finished a week ago.
I continue to believe that Judge Cannon will still appoint a special master to “check the work” of the filter team in identifying all of the privileged material.
quote:No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant, and they had a filter team review those documents to assure that the investigative team would NOT have access to privileged information, per SOP.
So they illegally siezed and looked at privileged documents.....ruh roh
This post was edited on 8/29/22 at 10:54 am
13
Posted on 8/29/22 at 10:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant, and they had a filter team review those documents to assure that the investigative team would NOT have access to privileged information, per SOP.
this is only accurate if the DOJ/FBI merits trust
after what happened with Crossfire Hurricane, they don't (and if you believe they do, you are a fool)
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant,
Aren’t warrants supposed to be very specific in what the feds are able to take from the location? I would imagine this will be a legal sticking point to further drag out this crap.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:12 am to AggieHank86
frick the fbi
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:26 am to AggieHank86
quote:
a filter team review those documents to assure that the investigative team would NOT have access to privileged information, per SOP.
You'd be okay with an opposing attorney having an internal 'filter team' review your clients privileged documents?
Posted on 8/29/22 at 11:30 am to AggieHank86
quote:
and they had a filter team review those documents to assure that the investigative team would NOT have access to privileged information
Perdón, but why should one not be just a little skeptical that this "filter team", the FBI/DOJ and some magistrate or judge would not be high-fiving after hours at the local watering hole?
This post was edited on 8/29/22 at 11:32 am
Posted on 8/29/22 at 12:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Yes, that is the PURPOSE of a filter/taint team.
So you think it is fine for attorney/client documents to be seized and reviewed by the government based upon a warrant with broad limits on areas that can be searched?
Posted on 8/29/22 at 1:05 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant,
Just like that FISA warrant was validly issued? You take their word for far more than it is worth.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 1:10 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant,
Just like the warrants from the FISA judge.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 1:18 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant,
Were his passports on the warrant too?
Posted on 8/29/22 at 1:33 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant, and they had a filter team review those documents to assure that the investigative team would NOT have access to privileged information, per SOP.
You can't truly think this is appropriate? I might as well give up my criminal defense practice and switch to Estate Planning if the Government can just seize and review all of my work product as part of SOP and determine later what THEY think is privileged. The 4th and 6th Amendments don't exist anymore.
Think like a lawyer and not a partisan.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 3:15 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, they legally took possession of documents pursuant to a validly-issued warrant, and they had a filter team review those documents to assure that the investigative team would NOT have access to privileged information, per SOP.
You are such a terrible lawyer
No way in hell does a warrant allow them to remove privileged information, so they can review it. Especially if it also falls under attorney/client privilege
You dont get a warrant, only to go on a fishing expedition
quote:
Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
You dont walk out with something, only to say "Sorry, my bad." Especially in a presidents home
Posted on 8/29/22 at 3:38 pm to AggieHank86
hmmmmmmmmm........
No bias here buddy!
https://twitter.com/JustTheNews/status/1564342096223404037?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
No bias here buddy!
https://twitter.com/JustTheNews/status/1564342096223404037?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
quote:
ormer Washington Field Office Special Agent in Charge Tim Thibault was reportedly escorted out of the Bureau's headquarters on Friday, amid whistleblower allegations that he showed political bias in his handling of politically sensitive investigations.
Posted on 8/29/22 at 3:40 pm to AggieHank86
Aren't you the self proclaimed libertarian? I think we all know you are paid to be here muddying up things. The question is by whom?
I think we all know you are paid to be here muddying up things. The question is by whom?This post was edited on 8/29/22 at 3:41 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News