Started By
Message

re: Was Africa better off under European colonial rule?

Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:18 am to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68863 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:18 am to

The descendants of slaves in the U.S. are definitely better off than if their ancestors had been left in Africa.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43131 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:27 am to
quote:

The descendants of slaves in the U.S. are definitely better off than if their ancestors had been left in Africa.

Anyone who disputes this /\ better have some good material to submit for analysis
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
7310 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

The descendants of slaves in the U.S. are definitely better off than if their ancestors had been left in Africa.


I think this is accurate through Western eyes. Material possessions, standard of living, medicine etc.. there's no comparison to be made. But are they really better off when it comes to families and morals and things that make a society work? We talk about the collapse of the black family here and all of the detrimental effects it has, as we should. Sub-Saharan Africa is far from perfect in this area but they're light years ahead of where black America finds itself currently.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram