Started By
Message

re: Was Africa better off under European colonial rule?

Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:05 am to
Posted by sta4ever
The Pit
Member since Aug 2014
15569 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:05 am to
Was the US better off under European colonial rule?
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
6025 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:08 am to



Wilbur Smith was the Michner of Africa when it comes to historical novels. About 30 books from pyramids to current day. Read for yourself. Very entertaining.

Tribel fractions is the base issue
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
25970 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:48 am to
Stick with the first question first before you go off on a meaningless tangent.
Posted by ElChapo
Caribbean
Member since Aug 2022
23 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:35 pm to
Absolutely it was better off under European colonial rule (except for apartheid)

I don’t mean to sound racist but facts are facts! Name one country that is run by either Africans or descendants of Africans (like the Caribbean) that is better off than a European/Anglo country!?

It’s not that they aren’t as capable, the problem is that corruption is ingrained in their culture, same with every Latin American country.
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
10675 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Was Africa better off under European colonial rule?


Yes

quote:

Was the US better off under European colonial rule?


No
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram