- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teedy apparently took away the cannon on the riverfront at Jackson Square yesterday
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:03 am to shaquilleoatmeal
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:03 am to shaquilleoatmeal
quote:I mean does this not sound ridiculous when you say it out loud? You think they just all got together and decided to swap jerseys like shirts and skins?
So Republican & Democratic platforms did not flip flop in the late 1800s into the 1900s? Ok
2
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:04 am to fr33manator
okPosted on 8/17/22 at 10:04 am to lsupride87
quote:
You think they just all got together and decided to swap jerseys like shirts and skins?
Yes, exactly like that.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:06 am to Turf Taint
quote:
Police need to use in the east.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:06 am to shaquilleoatmeal
quote:
shaquilleoatmeal
1. Which party wanted to treat people differently based on the color of their skin in the 1800s?
2. Which party wants to treat people differently based on the color of their skin in 2022?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:13 am to Smeg
quote:
1. Which party wanted to treat people differently based on the color of their skin in the 1800s? 2. Which party wants to treat people differently based on the color of their skin in 2022?
Which party did the majority of white conservative southerners who believed in states rights belong to in 1860?
Which party do the majority of white conservative southerners who believe in states rights belong to in 2022?
Weird, huh?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:14 am to Smeg
The reasoning behind this all is just so so dumb.
They equate democrats systematically dehumanizing the black race as a matter of principle (and then turning them into a vote plantation through the welfare state, the removal and emasculation of the black father, and the poisoning of the inner cities)
With the More conservative disapproval of the horrible, violent, irresponsible ghetto culture LBJ and the democrats plan has wrought.
There’s a reason that democrats call black conservatives “Uncle Tom’s” and use the hard -er about them behind closed doors.
They equate democrats systematically dehumanizing the black race as a matter of principle (and then turning them into a vote plantation through the welfare state, the removal and emasculation of the black father, and the poisoning of the inner cities)
With the More conservative disapproval of the horrible, violent, irresponsible ghetto culture LBJ and the democrats plan has wrought.
There’s a reason that democrats call black conservatives “Uncle Tom’s” and use the hard -er about them behind closed doors.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:14 am to lsupride87
quote:
I mean does this not sound ridiculous when you say it out loud? You think they just all got together and decided to swap jerseys like shirts and skins?
Yes, this is exactly how it happened.
All the KKK-going Democrats got together in secret and agreed to no longer hate black people and to do good for diversity, equity, and inclusion. This just happened out of the blue (and this is where the phrase "out of the blue" originated from, because the party ran out all of their more conservative, "blue dog" Democrats).
Coincidentally the Republicans also got together at the same time and decided they should abandon their existing principles and start hating black people and adopt Nazism in secret. One of their early drafts of their secret platform leaked out, though, and began circulating in Austria at the time, inspiring Hitler to flesh out the ideas in a little book called Mein Kampf, maybe you've heard of it, you bigot.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:15 am to Y.A. Tittle
Catering to the lowest common denominator in this country is getting tiresome.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:15 am to fr33manator
quote:
With the More conservative disapproval of
Desegregation.
Shut up.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:17 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Which party did the majority of white conservative southerners who believed in states rights belong to in 1860?
What is wrong with states rights exactly? It’s literally enshrined in the bill of rights, and the federal government has become insanely corrupt and bloated.
The democrats abandoned the whole “states rights” thing when they realized ever growing federal power was their key to staying relevant. Hence their insistence on broad, sweeping, one size fits all federal programs designed to keep people dependent on government.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:17 am to SammyTiger
FDR wasn't a desegregationist at all.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:19 am to SammyTiger
quote:
SammyTiger
Let's get closer.
1. Which party wanted racial segregation (blacks only) in the 1960s? Which party was George Wallace a part of?
1. Which party wants racial segregation (black only spaces) in colleges in 2022?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:19 am to Y.A. Tittle
She probably thinks that is the weapon that killed MLK Jr.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:19 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Desegregation.
Don’t worry, the democrats are still the party of segregation.
It’s back in vogue now too!
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:21 am to fr33manator
quote:
Muh parties switched!”
Philosophically and policywise, what would you say you have in common with Republicans of 1867, other than the name?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:25 am to fr33manator
quote:
Just round people up and ship them to Chicago? Is there any saving these cities ?
As with most revolutions in history, violence and bloodshed are inevitable.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:27 am to Smeg
quote:
Let's get closer.
You’re not getting closer.
quote:
1. Which party wanted racial segregation (blacks only) in the 1960s? Which party was George Wallace a part of?
Well a Democrat signed the bill didnt they?
Opposition also was dependent on party.
Just geography and race.
And what did George Wallace do in the 68 election? Ran as an independent and did pretty well, espcially in a specific area.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:28 am to shaquilleoatmeal
quote:
So Republican & Democratic platforms did not flip flop in the late 1800s into the 1900s?
No, they did not. Any other stupid fricking questions you want to ask?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 10:30 am to shaquilleoatmeal
“The Republican Party has never done anything for black people!”
“Well… they were called the Republican Party but they would all be in the Democrat Party today!”
People act like history began in 1964 with LBJ famously talking about how he will have black people voting Democrat for 200 years.
“Well… they were called the Republican Party but they would all be in the Democrat Party today!”
People act like history began in 1964 with LBJ famously talking about how he will have black people voting Democrat for 200 years.
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News