Started By
Message

re: Did the South ever really have a chance (Civil War)?

Posted on 7/18/22 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8020 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

, we were the vastly superior woodsman and fighters, h


This one always gets me. The Southern officer corps was better at the beginning of the war, but that advantage had evened out by the middle of the war through attrition and battlefield selection pressure.

But the individual Union soldiers were a lot more formidable and courageous than Southern sympathizers would have you believe - in that regard they were the equal of their Southern counterparts. How many times did backwoods and rural men from Michigan, Indiana Illinois, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Maine step up when it mattered?

There are towns in western Michigan that lost 50% of their male population in the war.
This post was edited on 7/18/22 at 1:06 pm
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
59172 posts
Posted on 7/18/22 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

But the individual Union soldiers were a lot more formidable and courageous than Southern sympathizers would have you believe - in that regard they were the equal of their Southern counterparts. How many times did backwoods and rural men from Michigan, Indiana Illinois, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Maine step up when it mattered?


Yep. In fact if you tour the Gettysburg Battlefield, they'll point out that maybe for the first time Southern troops faced a sizable number of Union soldiers who were themselves from very rural areas and had just as much experience with firearms, etc., as their Southern counterparts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram