Started By
Message

re: Rank our last 5 Athletic Directors

Posted on 7/15/22 at 9:27 am to
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6462 posts
Posted on 7/15/22 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Dean was hilariously worse than Alleva.


Dean was a cheapskate, but I think he was a far superior administrator to Alleva. Dean was turning a profit without the current TAF commitment level, a losing football team, a stadium that held 20,000 fewer people, no bowl revenue sharing, no SEC Network money, and TV contracts overall were a fraction of what were during Alleva's tenure.

Like Alleva was awful at evaluating coaches with his sole criteria being are they cheap. Dean was by no means a visionary, but that he was able to bring the AD into the black is nothing short of miraculous. If Alleva had been AD in the 80s our Athletic department would have been hemorrhaging money.
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 9:28 am
Posted by Domeskeller
Member since Jun 2020
7857 posts
Posted on 7/15/22 at 11:17 am to
I don’t care that Dean was turning a profit. We sucked at the important sports, except for baseball, which didn’t require much funding at the time.

Dean was by far the worst. As bad as Alleva was, he was way better than Dean.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram