Started By
Message

re: Boosters are over.

Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:55 am to
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55845 posts
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:55 am to
does this
quote:

a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.


equal this

quote:

Boosters are over
This post was edited on 1/12/22 at 9:55 am
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29009 posts
Posted on 1/12/22 at 9:59 am to
quote:

does this

quote: a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.

equal this

quote: Boosters are over


It does not. But it does mean pharma is going to have to develop new boosters to deal with new strains instead of just “keep taking boosters for the original virus that is pretty much gone.”

Not against vaccines by any stretch but when the only answer is “keep taking the same shot” you know it’s not an effective mitigation any more.
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2143 posts
Posted on 1/12/22 at 10:01 am to
That's not what the WHO said at all...way way out of context. They made that statement in reference to the limited supply of vaccine around the world and the need to use vaccine supply to provide primary vaccinations to people who have not yet been vaccinated.

In other words, a strategy where vaccinated people continue to get booster shots while lots of people cannot get their first shot is not appropriate or sustainable.

I hate the WHO more than anyone, but this post is not accurate.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram