How would hiring O be any different

How would it be different then when Clemson hired Dabo?

This argument along with "he only got it cause he's Cajun" is ridiculous and overblown.

How about play the season out, see what happens and go from there.

quote:

---

Than when Bama hired DuBose??

---

I don't know different school, different human being, different era, different pretty much everyfrickingthing. Except the retard fans.

quote:

---

but if you work a job for 10 years and don't improve with experience

---

But he hasn't had that job the last 10 years, being a head coach and a DL coach aren't the same thing.

They don't want to answer that question, they don't want to answer any questions really just keep saying he has learned from his past mistakes because he said so in a press conference

quote:

---

10 years ago. I know you close your eyes and ears and kick your legs like a child when that's brought up, but if you work a job for 10 years and don't improve with experience and never change, you don't belong in the profession at all.

---

Shouldn't he have used that time at a lesser program to prove he's learned and changed? Coaching 7 or 8 games with someone else's program doesn't prove that you can run a successful program for several years. Sorry, LSU is not a training ground for failed head coaches.

quote:

---

We could offer the job to ten prove head coaches and get turned down by all and Ed O would still be there to say "yes"

Because there is no other HC job available to him!!!

---

Bingo.

The coaching market determines value. And value usually means potential success.

No one else values the potential success of Coach O. No one has offered him a HC, making even a minimal coaching salary.

It all means something. It really does.

quote:

---

don't downplay it.

---

It might not be true for Prom, but bit definitely holds true in 80% of O bandwagoners

quote:

---

Lebowski

---