Started By
Message
locked post

Have y'all heard about S&P+ rankings?

Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:22 pm
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:22 pm
quote:

The S&P+ Ratings are a college football ratings system derived from the play-by-play and drive data of all 800+ of a season's FBS college football games (and 140,000+ plays). The components for S&P+ reflect opponent-adjusted components of four of what Bill Connelly has deemed the Five Factors of college football: efficiency, explosiveness, field position, and finishing drives. (A fifth factor, turnovers, is informed marginally by sack rates, the only quality-based statistic that has a consistent relationship with turnover margins.)


I was thinking they would be a good objective way to compare the offenses of the offensive coordinators we're looking at and compare to other coaches.

Here are the offensive rankings.
quote:

Off. S&P+ rating: A team's offense-specific S&P+ rating, presented in the form of an adjusted scoring average.


Oklahoma (1st)
Pitt (4th)
Alabama (16th)
Oregon (21st)

LINK

Of course I don't think these rankings are absolute, but still interesting and worth considering since the eye test is usually wrong and looking at some stats doesn't always tell the whole story



Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:26 pm to
if you had to choose 1 stat to rank an offense or defense, S&P+ is the best and its not even close imo.
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 10:31 pm
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

if you had to choose 1 stat to rank an offense or defense, S&P+ is the best and its not even close.



Yeah man. I actually got the site from your post earlier, just saw your thread too. Thanks for info.

I love in-depth metrics like this.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 10:40 pm to
another note here is that Pitt had the number 4 ranked offense despite playing 4 teams inside the S&P+ top 20 on defense

#6 Clemson - 43 points
#14 Miami - 28 points
#16 Penn State - 42 points
#20 VTech - 36 points

thats an average of 37 ppg

LSU averaged 28 ppg this year
This post was edited on 12/12/16 at 10:42 pm
Posted by CBP3110
Member since Aug 2012
6546 posts
Posted on 12/12/16 at 11:01 pm to
I laugh at nobody is commenting on this thread because it's dead on. Great post. Great positive post. Way to bring something legit instead of talking out of your arse and bitching about some binder.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:24 am to
Playing those good defenses actually helps with the ranking though.

Since Pitt did better offensively against those defensive teams than other schools did, their ranking is higher.

Posted by I-H8-BAMA
Benton, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2013
10427 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:30 am to
Interesting. Personally, I'm excited about Canada if we can reel him in. He seems to adapt to his players strengths very well. It's gonna be so goddamn refreshing seeing a new offense. I know in a lot of cases it will look pro style but just seeing new plays will give me a chub.
Posted by semjase
New Smyrna Beach FL
Member since May 2014
10934 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 12:41 am to
quote:

Personally, I'm excited about Canada if we can reel him in. He seems to adapt to his players strengths very well. It's gonna be so goddamn refreshing seeing a new offense. I know in a lot of cases it will look pro style but just seeing new plays will give me a chub.
Interview the guy and offer him the job with a much better $$$$$$ contract that he has at Pitt.

Don't frick around any longer. Get it done tomorrow. (Today)

As soon as the ink is dry, we'll have our QB back in the fold too!
Posted by ZBeaux10
Prairieville
Member since Jul 2015
602 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Playing those good defenses actually helps with the ranking though.

Since Pitt did better offensively against those defensive teams than other schools did, their ranking is higher.


You don't say? Using your argument, beating good teams probably makes you ranked higher, as well. Alabama really isn't that good. They just beat some good teams and didn't lose so they look a lot better than they truly are.
Posted by SoFresh
New Orleans
Member since May 2010
3068 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 8:56 am to
quote:

#6 Clemson - 43 points
#14 Miami - 28 points
#16 Penn State - 42 points
#20 VTech - 36 points


If LSU's offense scores that many points against any of those opponents, they win all of those games probably handily.

If it is indeed Canada, I'm interested to see what he can do with our talent. I don't care who you are, but 43 on Clemson and 42 on Penn State is impressive for any team.
Posted by MastrShake
SoCal
Member since Nov 2008
7281 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

but 43 on Clemson and 42 on Penn State is impressive for any team.
Clemson especially imo. theres simply no way to spin that, its impressive as hell on every level, and thats even before you consider the disparity in pure talent.
Posted by TigerNE
Everett, MA
Member since Jul 2013
1096 posts
Posted on 12/13/16 at 1:46 pm to
Great post. Something tangible for those of us who don't know much about these OC's in general and Canada in particular.
Posted by IAmTheTator
Frisco, TX
Member since Sep 2015
57 posts
Posted on 12/14/16 at 2:19 pm to



FEI is a good one also.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram