Started By
Message
locked post

when switching coaches is it more about "feel" or "style"?

Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:42 pm
Posted by Microtiger
Ithaca, New York
Member since Nov 2010
1435 posts
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:42 pm
Think about it a coach comes in, fresh from another school, are they looking at SPIRIT from this coach, or more for SKILL? what's more important to the AD donors and faculty?

I was thinking if a guy like Paul Rhodes came in you would have to say no because he has both spirit and skill and you really want a coach to focus on one of those, so moving on...

Let's talk about someone nobody has really mentioned yet, Jim Grobe at wake forest, he obviously only has ONE, but he also has a feel about him, a real positive energy
So let's say you brought him inas head coach but never paid. Exactly!

You have revenue coming from reputations which motivated both sides of the talk, that's why Grobe is out of the question I think in sec but maybe not so crazy top replace jim fisher at Florida state. If so, wake is a sleeping giant in that part of the country

How does this affect Arkansas and Tennessee's priorities? Not so much auburn, since they're looking to raise hell about limits and changes already...haha!
Posted by Mullen3:16
Nerlins, LA
Member since May 2012
4708 posts
Posted on 12/2/12 at 11:53 pm to
What the hell did I just read?
Posted by Wrenchruh
Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2012
2413 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:02 am to
There passages in Finnegan's Wake that are easier to decipher than this.
Posted by LittleRockHog501
Member since Nov 2011
2480 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:04 am to
What?
Posted by Hog Springs
I'm on a boat
Member since Nov 2010
4436 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:06 am to
W. T. F.
Posted by BamaChick
Terminus
Member since Dec 2008
21393 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:50 am to
What the hell was that gibberish?
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:48 am to
Seems to be some sort of smack talk favoring Iowa St., and some butthurt that none of the SEC schools are targeting their coach.

I've gotten pretty good at deciphering rantard over the years.
Posted by Microtiger
Ithaca, New York
Member since Nov 2010
1435 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:05 am to
Not pushing Paul Rhodes like I said he has both which to me is a BAD thing, it means a nonpure and unfocused character, I like him than chizik who we had before but I'm not happy with a man of dilute intangibles for team or for drives sake.

Sorry if I was unclear and seemed to confuse everyone think about it this way instead each coach is a "soup" but you can only put so many flavors in one soup before it's ruined, my questions are, what soup is the sec teams looking to order? And are those soups even on the menu?

Keeping in the metaphor consider ingredients and aroma, not just taste

Edit 2; I wanted to remind everyone how much HELP Petersen has gotten by looking good from a good team, most coaches will turn the torso and watch the play if on the field but he's the type to be reading or not even playing attention to the play, facing the sane direction
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 2:15 am
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46182 posts
Posted on 12/3/12 at 2:13 am to
I have no idea what you are saying but it is hilarious. I can't even attempt to decipher that shite.

quote:

Sorry I confused every one so lets talk about soup.

This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 2:15 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram