Started By
Message
locked post

I would have rather had a successful mid-major guy than Steele.

Posted on 1/13/15 at 5:42 pm
Posted by Franktowntiger7
Ponchatoula
Member since Dec 2010
2719 posts
Posted on 1/13/15 at 5:42 pm
He can recruit. Who cares? Chavis wasn't a good recruiter, he was just a good DC.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29267 posts
Posted on 1/13/15 at 5:43 pm to
But we stole him from Bama!

Yeehaw!
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/13/15 at 5:47 pm to
Elko at Bowling Green

Wake Forest guy

Homeless dude on the corner


All better than Steele.
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5102 posts
Posted on 1/13/15 at 5:54 pm to
Yes
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56538 posts
Posted on 1/13/15 at 5:57 pm to
Absolutely.

When Miles promoted Malleveto, what he was really saying was that LSU didn't need one guy coordinating the defense. He thought he could get by having everyone maintain their current assignments.

That obviously failed, and Miles brought in Chavis. Chavis didn't do anything spectacular schematically. But, he made sure the defense was fundamentally sound from top to bottom and the quality control that was missing with Malleveto returned almost immediately.

I think he made the same mistake again. He hired a guy who really doesn't have a history to point to of successfully coordinating a defense. I do think he's probably a good LB coach. LSU needed much more than that IMO.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram