Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:16808
Registered on:1/18/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: They are pushing for Nikki

Posted by BobBoucher on 6/1/24 at 1:00 pm
Trump won’t do it. She’s a GOPe Never Trump plant. She’d be there to blunt his agenda. ...
[quote]That is a fairy tale. You are comparing dissimilar things - polls and election results.[/quote] Unless the polls intentionally oversampled republicans and independents - then maybe you’re right. Otherwise - if the sampling was done correctly, I have a hard time believing there’s a 20pt...
I doubt Trump can win NY, but just cutting that 22-23 point lead to single digits is a massive accomplishment. NY, Illinois, and Cali carry the popular vote. If he gets those in single digits, he dominates the popular vote too. ...

re: Supreme Court

Posted by BobBoucher on 5/30/24 at 4:28 pm
[quote]Not true scotus can take up any case it chooses to See Bush Gore 200”[/quote] Good to know. Just relaying what the talking heads are saying. ...

re: Supreme Court

Posted by BobBoucher on 5/30/24 at 4:26 pm
I heard on Fox that they have to exhaust everything lower first, which could take months or years. Hard to imagine a court sits on this. But you never know with leftists. ...

Guilty

Posted by BobBoucher on 5/30/24 at 4:08 pm
Damn. ...
[quote]According to CNN no hung jury - it is a unanimous verdict If true, that's not guilty all around.[/quote] Has to be. Reaching a guilty verdict on a POTUS would have to be bulletproof. This case is anything but. I think it’s way easier to get to acquittal than guilty. ESP this qui...
[quote]That’s what I’m thinking. If so he’ll be retried and tied up in court for another six weeks or so.[/quote] This could be a secondary goal of Merchan if not guilty. Get it hung and a redo. Still a win for Dems. ...
[quote]An example like that is often used to explain what circumstantial as opposed to direct evidence is, but usually with snow instead of rain.[/quote] It’s hard to get any conviction on circumstantial evidence alone. For a former POTUS - should be no fricking way. any crime evidence and trial s...

re: Democrat's Secret Weapon

Posted by BobBoucher on 5/30/24 at 12:56 pm
[quote]That was a warm up for Taylor Swift doing the exact same shite to all of her Swifty fans. [/quote] You got a scoop on that? Sounded like she intended to not go beyond just saying “get out and vote”. ...
[quote]Judge Juan Merchan just got exposed for his corruption by the jury,[/quote] Interesting if this is what the Jury is saying. Could be a total rebuke of the judge by the jury. I doubt this is the case. I suspect there’s a handful of jurors who are interpreting this literally, as Merch...
[quote]But... if the streets are wet and people are wearing raincoats and carrying umbrellas, that's pretty darn good proof that it rained, is it not? I mean... I guess they could have sprayed the streets with water and convinced everyone to wear a raincoat and carry an umbrella to make you t...
CNN sending a subtle message to Merchan. “You’re our only hope!”...
I think that happens if Merchan swaps jurors to get there. And then I think it’s just house arrest so he can’t campaign. That’s all this is about. Making him a convicted felon. ...
[quote]can't imagine the blowback if he did that[/quote] We’re beyond that. His court has been completely unconstitutional. He’s just trying to get a conviction at any cost so Biden can say “convicted felon Donald Trump”. ...

re: Supreme Court Rulings?

Posted by BobBoucher on 5/30/24 at 9:35 am
[quote]On what, exactly, are you basing your opinion? What leads you to believe that they wouldn't want to rule on this until after November? Other than your basic lack of intellect and common sense?[/quote] That’s where I’m at. I’d think they want it resolved ASAP...

re: The underlying crime.

Posted by BobBoucher on 5/29/24 at 9:51 pm
[quote]Hence, why Merchan barred the defense's federal election law expert[/quote] Yep. He could have destroyed their case. Merchan couldn’t risk looking like a biased idiot. Not negotiating the jury rules with the defense and prosecution is another red flag. As is the “prick any” menu of...
The key point here is that the prosecution and defense are supposed to agree on the jury rules. But in this case, the judge made his own unilaterally. All to save democracy!...
[quote]What? So they decided on 34 falsifying record crimes before seeing if he had an intent to commit another crime? That makes no sense. [/quote] I dunno. Seems like Pecker testimony is more related to election interference than falsified records. ...
[quote]That he regularly buried stories for Trump[/quote] That tells you they are working on the “2nd crime”. Which crime would a jury tackle first? That’s a big clue. If they tackle the falsified records first, then move on once they have unanimity, that’s huge. ...