Started By
Message

re: Per Zach Lowe: Pelicans added to teams that will pursue D Mitchell if no extension

Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:47 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111201 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

I still like Mitchell, I just think it will cost us BI and Herb and some firsts, maybe more
Correct

SFPs evaluation is off. Not as off as Jarrett Allen may only fetch a 2nd, but nonetheless, it's off.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
14957 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:48 pm to
Not to beat a dead horse but it pisses me off to see someone like Mitchell averaging over 9 threes a game when we can’t get BI to even take 4.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
12000 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

That’s why you trade for them..
For a year rental? No thanks.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
12000 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

No need to

Ingram and Herb with 5 picks for Mitchell and Allen would beat any other offer anybody could put out there.

You obviously only do it if he agrees to the extension before the trade though, or at least says he would definitely be willing to re-sign
So if your theory is that someone like him would not sign with NOLA, so you have to trade for him, you assume he will extend? Way too much for him anyway.
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10494 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:03 pm to
Doubt he'd go for a superstar type of package without agreeing that an extension with his new team.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
12000 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

BI+Herb is not an overpay for a top 15 player.
You forgot the 5 1st rounders too.

He wants a big city. He is not going to extend with the Pels. Some are dreaming.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
12000 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:08 pm to
quote:


Doubt he'd go for a superstar type of package without agreeing that an extension with his new team.
Why would anyone think he would agree to extend in NOLA though?
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10494 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:18 pm to
That's what they have to find out dipshit. You're fricking dense as hell.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61598 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:21 pm to
If Cleveland is trading him it's because he wouldn't sign an extension with them. Why would he sign an extension with the Pels if he wouldn't with the Cavs?

No extension = Low offer from Griff. Most of the competitors appear to be markets he would stay in long term, so they can go further than the Pels if Mitchell doesn't agree to an extension, which I don't think he would if he's actually being traded.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
9020 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:27 pm to
He’s not agreeing to sign an extension without ever playing here lol. Not this market. Maybe he’ll do that at a premier city.

Like I keep saying, the time to trade for him was two years ago. Griff is an idiot if he sends out real value with out an extension signed for him.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 6:28 pm
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10494 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:31 pm to
Nobody knows other than the rumors that are floating around. That's why teams will need to find out what he wants and his value will be directly proportional to the cost. And that will play a large role in how teams approach the risks of pursuing him or not.
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10494 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:34 pm to
Again, whether he agrees to an extension or not isn't even my argument. The price Cleveland can demand is what I'm focusing on and his willingness to accept an extension for whatever teams trades for him will be the deciding factor on how much Clevand can extort for him.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
12000 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:47 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 6:49 pm
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
12000 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

If Cleveland is trading him it's because he wouldn't sign an extension with them. Why would he sign an extension with the Pels if he wouldn't with the Cavs?

No extension = Low offer from Griff. Most of the competitors appear to be markets he would stay in long term, so they can go further than the Pels if Mitchell doesn't agree to an extension, which I don't think he would if he's actually being traded.
Would seem obvious to most. Pretty logical.
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9157 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

You are the dipshit (as usual). You are freaking clueless if you think Mitchell will leave Cleveland to sign an extension in NOLA.


We get it you and supe12staz don’t agree. No need to call other posters names and clog up the thread. Always trying to get the last word as usual. Tsk tsk.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 6:54 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424209 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:54 pm to
The lack of suitors is why I said days (weeks?) ago why he could be acquired for a reduced price

*ETA: this means huge risk of him not re-signing
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 6:55 pm
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27350 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

Yeah it’ll have to be BI, Herb and 3 picks


Maybe it can be a little less since he has 1 year left in his contract but idk


That offer would have to have something else back from the cavs. Probably allen. Pels would then likely have to add.

Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27350 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

You obviously only do it if he agrees to the extension before the trade though,
Then sign me up... but there's zero chance that happens


Well then you don't do it.

Any team is going to want that.

The pels aren't going to be his pick.

He either stays in Cleveland or goes to miami imo.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27350 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Never. It’s quite amusing. I had 3 upvotes and 130+ downvotes saying we should do whatever to get Mitch. And now everyone wants him.



People on here also shite on trading for dame or kyrie.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34437 posts
Posted on 5/17/24 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Ingram and Herb with 5 picks for Mitchell and Allen


It would beat anyone else because it's an enormous overpay.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 10:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram