- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Per Zach Lowe: Pelicans added to teams that will pursue D Mitchell if no extension
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:05 pm to Townedrunkard
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:05 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
This would be way way more of an overpay compared to what the Cavs paid.
I agree that it’s more, but DMitch has proven he’s a much better player than he was in Utah
2
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:06 pm to supe12sta12z
We are talking about a trade today not after their first year
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:07 pm to Baron
quote:
but DMitch has proven he’s a much better player than he was in Utah
Wait what? Has he?
Also this is the second team in a row that he's had to leave because of conflicts and he's not a number one on a title team so I imagine it will be less than 3 years before he wants out of here if we are Zion focused
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:14 pm to Baron
According to this board, only the value of our players rises while everyone we want to trade for supposedly has stagnant or low value. fricking pels talk man. 
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:16 pm to Macintosh504
quote:For just Mitchell? Idk about that. If its for Mitchell and Allen, then yeah that along with Dyson would probably work.
Yeah it’ll have to be BI, Herb and 3 picks
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:This was 2 years ago, and they had no use for CJ.
Herb and Trey are both worth more than any player who went out in that deal, and we're ignoring BI, who is worth a LOT more than any player who went out in that deal
You have to give them something they want. This isn't 2k with adjusted trade sliders. That's not how this works.
Who were the young assets we had that they would have wanted other than Herb and Trey?
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:20 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:Bingo
Trey and Herb weren't really worth much after their first year. I think this is revisionist at its finest.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Only the entire discussion. Other than that, nothing I guess.
What does this have to do with the price of tea in China?
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:22 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:Does it ever get tiring being the only person who is right about everything while "everyone" else is always wrong about everything
I was the biggest Lauri guy on the board. Another person everyone on here was dead wrong about
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:We're literally talking about a potential Mitchell trade 2 years ago and have been for probably over 1 page now.
We are talking about a trade today not after their first year
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:28 pm to shel311
quote:
This was 2 years ago, and they had no use for CJ.
Ok I think I get the other guy's confusion.
I'm not talking about our hypothetical opportunity 2 years ago.
I'm talking about our player assets now v. what Utah actually got for DMitch
quote:
Herb and Trey are both worth more than any player who went out in that deal,
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:28 pm to shel311
quote:
We're literally talking about a potential Mitchell trade 2 years ago
Naw
Y'all got confused
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:L
Naw
Y'all got confused
O
L
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:30 pm to shel311
quote:
Does it ever get tiring being the only person who is right about everything while "everyone" else is always wrong about everything
Never. It’s quite amusing. I had 3 upvotes and 130+ downvotes saying we should do whatever to get Mitch. And now everyone wants him.
And now I don’t think he’s right for this team at this moment or the cost it would take to get him. So yes, I find it very amusing. Especially if Griff really has interest in him. But maybe it’s just leaked to up his price to other teams.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:30 pm to shel311
quote:
L
O
L
No seriously. Y'alll got confused. Nowhere did I reference any comparison b/w a hypothetical deal 2 years ago. I compared the actual trade 2 years ago with the value of our assets today.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:30 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:Everyone!!!!
And now everyone wants him.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:32 pm to shel311
Maybe not SFP..
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:34 pm to Townedrunkard
[
quote:Maybe not me
Maybe not SFP..
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:34 pm to Townedrunkard
It just depends on the price. Obviously he's worth more than Trae, so a straight swap for BI is out of the picture. A real 1st and a protected 1st down the road + BI is probably as much as I'd pay.
If we can get Allen, then it gets more interesting.
If we can get Allen, then it gets more interesting.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
I still like Mitchell, I just think it will cost us BI and Herb and some firsts, maybe more.
I just think the acquisition costs and fit factored in, Trae is the way to go at this point in time. Like I said before, the time to get Mitch was two years ago.
I just think the acquisition costs and fit factored in, Trae is the way to go at this point in time. Like I said before, the time to get Mitch was two years ago.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 5:44 pm
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News